Sunday, February 27, 2011

How To Make A Lead Mold

Le discours d'un roi (The King's speech), film




When I was about two months ago saw a trailer for the film, he did not impress me at all and I pre-assemble it did not. Then he saw trailer for a few more times, the impression has not changed. Then the film came out, I'm at it as not going to go and not go, and yet with all the parties were rush rave reviews about the movie, and I began to waver, not to go there. Rather, the rave reviews rushed from all sides, except for one - one of my good girlfriend and an Anglophile besides, who knows a lot and had seen a man whose opinion I am interested in more expensive, surprisingly (even for me) spoke of the film with restraint. That, however, only fueled my curiosity.
Yesterday we call friends, offered to arrange a joint output, and to me anywhere especially do not want to go, so I said that I was only interested in this film and, thus, of course, in VO (watch this movie dubbed in general does not make sense). Film in New Orleans is almost passed, is duplicated in only one room and not dubbed - Only in the cinema Art et essais, where halls are very small and the screen is small, the room is hot, legs closely, etc. I was sure that my friends refuse (and Philip did not want particularly to go to a movie and went on not particularly want to). But all agreed, so we went a restaurant and then a movie at the last session.
What can I say? (Generally, all probably already guessed that since I've been entered, it's because I have a basic part of the proceeding as a reluctant ...)
I do not know what will happen with the Oscars (probably will, and much of the movie is absolutely Oscar-winning profile), but so far for me the winner is
[info] escucha_mi . I do not know to what extent the similarity of our feelings, but in any case closest to me what she said about the film.
This is very good made film (with reservations still). Great decor, great actors and great acting. And how wonderful they say in English! But on the other hand, would we expect anything else from the British? "When you go to watch English movie or start the next series, in material (here I include the same casting), which is, as production is not in doubt, the film adaptation of us accustomed to it.
I hear a chorus of voices: "And this is not a screen!" That's the problem, that she is. The plot is built on real facts, the main character - King George VI (father of Elizabeth - and discuss the topic of random or nonrandom coincidences with the calendar schedules of the royal family, I'm not even going, I kind of did not notice anything), selflessly struggling with his own stuttering, prohibitive country, and Gland - say unites the nation speech. It is very interesting to me, for example, this historical fact was not familiar, but about the work of speech therapists I'm ready read, listen and watch as they want.
Here is the movie story and filmed . Very well filmed, very high quality, but no more. Dasha cited someone looked a movie and enthusiastic claims that this film - for thinking people. I will not say anything about the immodesty of such statements, but the problem that the film just does not offer anything to think he is very illustrative, and that's all. And to think
offer could be. For example, the monarchy and the media (very to court , is not it?) Stuttering - heavy defect, it can bring real suffering, but to interfere with running the country, he became only the proliferation radio ...
or history abdicated from the throne of his elder brother George - the movie is clear that he had contacted the adventurer, but after a long time the same story told how incredibly romantic, just about a handsome prince and Cinderella.
Well, about a speech therapist or if - a very flamboyant actor, but superficially, at the level of anecdote - something that was hinted about the psychological and mental causes of stuttering, something that touches about methods of work, about the identity of the strange speech therapy - think out for yourself (I'd read a book - is there any?) credits at the end of the film only mentioned that he and George VI remained friends until the end days. But this is all I was thinking that there might be (I still have lots of ideas), in the film - this is an illustration, screen stories. Very good, as I said, but not without deficiencies.
Home tightened, as there Say what you like.
A climax, the finale ... Clearly, this speech itself, there is no suspense there, it is clear that he was well deliver. And we listen carefully ... but almost nothing has been heard. Because the director distracts us. First, we focus on the technical side - the king overcomes every word. Then he becomes more confident, and the director begins to distract us pictures - how different segments of the population listened to the king. A voice is confident and more confident - and that we would listen to him, but then on top of the director admits the solemn music. What is said the King - none of the spectators, I'm sure, and really did not catch (in vain, he goes, he tried), but nothing - the text is certainly on the Internet.

In general, the quality of this movie (just not necessary attribute to him qualities which he does not), good even for a Saturday night with friends (all other participants kultpohoda liked the movie) - well just that we went to a restaurant, not only in the movies ...


PS Teachers and amateurs are invited to meditate on the use of articles in the original title The King's speech and French version Le discours d'un roi . For me as a replacement is not obvious.

0 comments:

Post a Comment